Labels:book | reckoner | sky OCR: of eligibility for parole has not changed: that date was fixed from the start. See S.C. Code Ann. T 24-21 -610 {1976} as amended I.A 37) What has changed is the procedure governing the interval between parote hearings after rejection. For Roller that interval used to be ane year (see 24-21. [-620); now two years (see 24-21-645). .A 3 respectively) This all that has been changed No punishment has been added tc Roller's original sentence after the fact. His sentence has not been lengthened. His parole eligibility has not been revoked altered in any way No gain tine' credits have been lost retroactively A the Supreme Court of South Carolina found Gunter State, 298 13 378 2d 443 (1989) "the standards governing petitioner's parole eligibility have 1ou been changed. Instead only the frequency wi ...
(.png)
